The "Accuracy" Myth
Machine tool brochures often quote a single accuracy number, but acceptance and verification require more context. Under ISO 230-2, axis performance is evaluated from repeated direct measurements with defined calculation methods.
The Big Three Metrics
1. Positioning Accuracy (A)
How close the commanded position is to the measured position over the tested travel range.
Use report definitions exactly as stated by the test provider.
2. Repeatability (R)
How consistently the axis returns to the same commanded position under the same test conditions.
Interpret with run count, direction method, and uncertainty data.
3. Reversal Error (B)
Directional difference that appears when the axis approaches the same point from opposite directions.
Use together with mechanical condition checks (screw, bearing, coupling, compensation).
ISO 230-2 vs JIS B 6338
Be careful when comparing reports prepared under different standards frameworks.
- ISO 230-2: Defines a direct-measurement framework for evaluating positioning accuracy and repeatability on numerically controlled axes.
- Cross-standard comparison: Always align test setup, travel length, run count, environmental condition, and uncertainty treatment before comparing numbers.
Reading a Laser Calibration Report
Laser interferometer reports can be used for acceptance, periodic verification, and compensation review.
Look for trend shape: A consistent slope can indicate scale/compensation mismatch or thermal influence.
Look for directional split: A gap between forward and reverse traces can indicate reversal-related mechanical behavior that should be investigated.
The 20°C Rule
All accuracy standards are defined at 20°C (68°F).
Thermal expansion is material-dependent, but for many steels the linear coefficient is on the order of 10–12 µm/m/°C. A simple estimate at +10°C over a 1 m structure yields roughly 100–120 µm of growth. Use your machine/material data and compensation strategy to calculate the actual risk.