Skip to main content
Back to Resources

Metrology Standard

ISO 230-2 Positioning Accuracy

Read axis positioning, repeatability, and reversal-error data from laser/interferometer reports before accepting, relocating, compensating, or comparing a CNC machine.

Reviewed: 2026-03-08Source: Reviewed against ISO 230, GB/T 17421, OEM documentation, and shop-floor calculator assumptions.

Direct answer: ISO 230-2 evaluates positioning accuracy and repeatability of numerically controlled axes with repeated direct measurements at defined target positions.

Use this guide to interpret axis positioning and repeatability in laser or interferometer reports; do not treat it as the general ISO 230 series index. Use the ISO 230 overview for acceptance evidence and the reference table when you need another test family.

ISO Acceptance Decision Path

Follow this path from ISO overview to geometric-test method, axis reports, series selection, and GB/T 17421 mapping.

The "Accuracy" Myth

Machine tool brochures often quote a single accuracy number, but acceptance and verification require more context. Under ISO 230-2, axis performance is evaluated from repeated direct measurements with defined calculation methods.

Renishaw XL-80 laser interferometer setup on a VMC machine bed with visible red laser beam along X-axis, retroreflector on spindle, laptop showing positioning accuracy trace at 20.0 degrees C for CNC machining workflows
A Renishaw laser interferometer measures X-axis positioning accuracy per ISO 230-2 — the red beam and retroreflector reveal micron-level deviations across the full travel

The Big Three Metrics

1. Positioning Accuracy (A)

How close the commanded position is to the measured position over the tested travel range.

Use report definitions exactly as stated by the test provider.

2. Repeatability (R)

How consistently the axis returns to the same commanded position under the same test conditions.

Interpret with run count, direction method, and uncertainty data.

3. Reversal Error (B)

Directional difference that appears when the axis approaches the same point from opposite directions.

Use together with mechanical condition checks (screw, bearing, coupling, compensation).

ISO 230-2 vs JIS B 6338

Be careful when comparing reports prepared under different standards frameworks.

  • ISO 230-2: Defines a direct-measurement framework for evaluating positioning accuracy and repeatability on numerically controlled axes.
  • Cross-standard comparison: Always align test setup, travel length, run count, environmental condition, and uncertainty treatment before comparing numbers.

Reading a Laser Calibration Report

Laser interferometer reports can be used for acceptance, periodic verification, and compensation review.

Look for trend shape: A consistent slope can indicate scale/compensation mismatch or thermal influence.

Look for directional split: A gap between forward and reverse traces can indicate reversal-related mechanical behavior that should be investigated.

Acceptance Limit Boundary

Acceptance limit note: ISO 230-2 defines the test and reporting method; the pass/fail limit must come from the purchase contract, builder specification, or customer quality plan. Do not compare two reports unless the travel range, target positions, approach directions, environment, uncertainty statement, and compensation state are aligned.

The 20°C Rule

All accuracy standards are defined at 20°C (68°F).

Thermal expansion is material-dependent, but for many steels the linear coefficient is on the order of 10–12 µm/m/°C. A simple estimate at +10°C over a 1 m structure yields roughly 100–120 µm of growth. Use your machine/material data and compensation strategy to calculate the actual risk.

Use the ISO standards overview to confirm acceptance evidence, then use the ISO 230 reference table to choose the correct test family before reading an axis report. If the report changes a purchase decision, validate machine fit with the equipment selection calculator.